Showing posts with label revenue models. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revenue models. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2009

Twitter reveals details about its business model

In this very interesting conversation with Dick Costolo, COO at Twitter, at the Real-Time CrunchUp Nov 20th, the company's business model is discussed, confirming that the deals with Microsoft and Google are bringing Twitter money. Costolo also answers questions about the newly turned-on Geolocation API and its possibilities.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Videos from New Business Models For News Summit  2008

Below is a great collection (3h) of videos from New Business Models For News Summit 2008, held at University of New York’s Journalism School, organized by Jeff Jarvis. The three videos cover very interesting presentations and summaries from group discussions about network models for news and media, new structures for news organizations, new efficiencies and structures for newsrooms, new revenue opportunities and models, and public support of journalism.

Jeff Jarvis' Introduction Slides:

Part I:

Speakers:
Jeff Jarvis, CUNY
Edward Roussel, Telegraph
Dave Morgan, Tacoda
Colin Crawford, IDG
Michael Rosenblum, video training

Part II:

Speakers:
Charlie Sennott, GlobalPost.com
Mark Josephson, Outside.in
Adam Davidson, NPR Planet Money
Samir Arora, Glam
Tom Evslin, ITXC

Part III:

Speakers:
Upendra Shardanand, Daylife
Scott Karp, Publish2
Dave Chase, NextNewsNet
Adam Bly, ScienceBlogs
David Cohn, Spot.us
Jeff Jarvis, CUNY
Scott Meyer, Warburg Pincus
Benjamin Wagner, MTV
Jan Shaffer, J-Lab
John Hassell, Star-Ledger


Related posts:
Related videos:

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Music 2.0 Business Models from Future of Music Coalition

Below is a great collection of business models including information on revenue models and how much musicians, labels and songwriters are compensated. It has been put together by Future of Music Coalition, a nonprofit organization that works to ensure a diverse musical culture.

There are many great examples in the presentation and attached pdf files from services such as: CD Baby, TuneCore, ReverbNation, Nimbit, The Orchard, iTunes Music Store, Amazon Music Store, Amie Street, Rhapsody or Napster, eMusic, Magnatune, ArtistShare, Kickstarter, Sellaband, Rumblefish/Pump Audio, Pandora, Last FM, MySpace Music, KEXP, Sirius XM Satellite Radio and MusicChoice. Also, examples from artists such as Issa/Jane Siberry, Radiohead, Nine Inch Nails and Jill Sobule.









Related posts:
Related videos:

Sunday, October 11, 2009

David Heinemeier Hansson on Charging for Online Services

With a focus on start-ups, David Heinemeier, creator of the Ruby on Rails framework and Partner at 37Signals, gives a fun presentation full of insights on charging for online services. Examples on pricing from 37Signals, Campaign Monitor, FogBugz and FaxItNice.



More videos:
Videos on business models

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Is the Advertising Model Dead?

Another interesting panel from The Revenue Bootcamp held on Microsoft campus in Mountain View, California. In this session Bill Reichert, managing director Garage Technology Ventures moderates the discussion about advertising.

Participants:
Samir Arora, Chairman and CEO, Glam Media
Neil Chase, VP Author Services, Federated Media
Tim Kendall, Direcotor Monetization, Facebook
David Kopp, Senior Director, North American Ads, Yahoo!
Xavier Zang, Publisher Partner Management, Microsoft




More videos:

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Journalism and business models discussed by a panel at the International Center for Journalists' annual Board Dinner

Two unexpected quotes from the panel about journalism and business models that made me laugh:

“In fact journalists take government support all the time; that is why they got relief so that they can have tiny little boys delivering newspapers, not have to be paying attention to child labor laws, or why they got to have joint operating agreements in contravention to laws of fair trade, or why they get postal privileges”

“I’ll tell you a business model that works really well. Porn. I don’t want to be distasteful but there is plenty of free porn on the Internet and there are some incredibly successful websites where you have to pay to get your porn… …they are obviously continuing to get something there when the same commodity is available for free elsewhere. And why? – Because it’s indispensible to them, it is necessary, it is fulfilling some kind of need, and it is being delivered to them in a platform that makes sense to them at that moment. And quite frankly, we are not doing that in journalism anymore.”







More videos:
Interview with Steve Rubel on business models for newspapers and online communities
Eric Schmidt on news, newspapers and real time content
Mad Avenue Blues - The year the media died

Further Reading:
Outlook for Newspaper publishing: Moving into multiple business models

Friday, May 15, 2009

Outlook for Newspaper publishing: Moving into multiple business models

The newspaper industry has seen a long-term decline in circulation volume and advertisers have been moving from newspapers to online channels and into new formats to reach its target groups. At the same time several newspaper publishers that have started online TV-like experiences in relation to their online news sites, thus finding new audiences beyond their traditional print readers. The global economic downturn has accelerated the need for many newspaper publishers to adjust their business models to survive and as this 56 page report concludes "there will be some casualties and losses of well-known papers along the way."

The report On the outlook for newspapers in the digital age: Moving into multiple business models, is an interesting read from PricewaterhouseCoopers. Based on interviews with industry actors and 4900 consumers, it focuses on two key issues: the change of consumer behavior with respect to their consumption of news content, and the response of newspaper publishers, advertisers, advertising agencies and media buyers to these changes.

The change of consumer behavior
PwC concludes that print will remain the largest source of revenue generation for some time but will have to coexist with other media in new ways. Consumers see breaking news and general interest news as commodities, something that is more difficult to charge for online than offline. Instead they place a high value on deep insights and analysis provided by journalists, and a growing segment is increasingly demanding specialized information.

Consumers increasingly expect to be part of the debate and to be able to contribute to their newspaper, both in terms of commenting and in providing content. Perhaps surprising is that the rapid adoption of mobile technology and devices, has not yet resulted in high preference to use mobile devices for accessing information due to the difficulty of reading content and thus the overall willingness to pay for news on e-paper and mobile devices is low. Perhaps new business models around Amazon Kindle or perhaps a future e-reader from Apple? will do the trick?

Advertisers' perspective
The authors conclude that the shift of advertising revenue from print to online is expected to continue over the next few years even though TV appears to remain the most attractive medium for advertisers. However, advertisers can, and choose to, use multi-platform approaches, combining newspapers, magazines, mobile, the Internet, TV, cinema, radio, sponsorship and outdoor advertising. Main focus in the economic downturn is to use reliable and measurable media types to achieve the best return on investment. Another interesting conclusion is that advertisers are still reluctant to invest in user-generated content and social networking sites due to the difficulty of controlling the environment.

Publishers' perspective
The authors conclude that traditional newspapers have a relatively loyal reader base even though younger readers increasingly prefer to read news online. And although there is a huge potential for growth online and many younger readers prefer to read news online, the conclusion is that print will remain the largest source of revenue generation for some time. At the same time newspaper publishers are reassessing the role of the aggregator and are starting to introduce new subscription models combining multiple platforms and new technologies as new channels for distributing content.

PwC concludes that there is a shift in the organizational structure of newspaper publishing operations from a structure based on channel distribution to one based on content production. As actors in adjacent industries such as telecom providers are becoming media participants, newspapers can leverage their advantages of being a trusted source of information and having content creation as a core competence.

What about business models around APIs?
Something I miss in the report is the concept of a newspaper as an open platform. Newspapers such as the Guardian and the New York Times, and news organizations such as BBC and NPR have started to provide API (application programming interface) which allow third-party developers to access and reuse content databases in their own applications. This is something that the content owners can chose to charge for, enabling very interesting business models.

How will news be experienced online?
In the early days of the television, news was presented as if being in a newspaper. The Internet is only in its very early days and companies are exploring new ways to use algorithms analyzing twitter conversations to identify breaking news and combine videos, links, blogs, comments and communities to explore ways to provide deep insights and analysis. I believe the consumers answering these questions have a clear perception of how online news is and will be presented, and as Henry Ford allegedly once said "If I'd asked my customers what they wanted, they'd have said a faster horse."

This is a great report to dive into and contains much more than what I have covered above. For those of you interested to read more download the full report and watch a short video here.

Related posts:
The Freemium Business Model
Subscription-based business models

Related videos:
Eric Schmidt on news, newspapers and real time content
Tim O'Reilly on NYTimes.com as a news and information platform
Tim O'Reilly on Open Publishing

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Visualizing value propositions and revenue models

On the website Boardofinnovation 10 generic building blocks are presented to "build any business model". Each building block is presented graphically and the idea is to visualize different business models to enable mapping and comparison of different businesses and "a new way of designing and innovating business models." I find visualizing business models very powerful, see for example the business model canvas, and the way of drawing blocks and arrows is of course a commonly used method to describe business models.


The visualized building blocks are:
Company - the company whose business model is described
Product - from commodities to finished goods
Services - services around a product or stand alone
Experience - not only offering a product or service but an experience
Reputation - a brand experience shaping client identity
Client- receives the product and gives something in return
Money - the normal value of a good
Less Money - less money than the normal value of a good
Attention - a currency of paying attention to advertising
Exposure - a currency of spreading the word

Building blocks to describe value propositions and revenue models
The term business model can be understood in a broad or narrow sense and can be expressed, visualized and explained in many different ways. Common elements in a business model, not described by the 10 building blocks presented above are what internal and external assets and capabilities that are used, what activities that are performed, how the value propositions are delivered, what forms of relationships the company has with its clients and external partners, control mechanisms used and the business model cost structure.

According to me what the 10 building blocks describe is not the business model but the different involved actors, value propositions and different types of revenues and benefits. It gives a first understanding of what a business model is about but it doesn't explain how value is created or delivered and only using the 10 building blocks will make fundamentally different business models look similar if they share some similar principles.

The main contributions with the 10 building blocks are according to me the blocks "experience" and "reputation" broadening the concept of value propositions from products and services, and "exposure" and "attention" broadening the concept of revenue model.

Broadening the concept of value propositions
A value proposition is often defined as "what the customer gets for what the customer pays" or "a bundle of products and services that are of value to the customer". I argue in my post about value propositions that a value proposition is how value is bundled and offered to potential value recipients where the term "value" is not limited to products and services and the term "value recipient" is not limited to customers.

Providing something new, something unique, something more convenient or accessible, customized, with higher performance or to a lower price are all common value propositions towards traditional customers. But value can also be to enable risk- or cost reduction for a supplier, provide access to databases or research tools for early-stage university research, provide user data to "upstream" application developers, out-license manufacturing or quality assurance processes to other companies, cross-license technology & IP, bring passengers to remote airports, provide jobs and environmental responsibility for a region, pay tax to a government, or take active involvement in a community.

The building blocks "experience" and "reputation" adds, according to me, important dimensions to the common perception of the value proposition. "Belonging" is another interesting dimension when the value proposition includes being part of a community, that shares common interests or values. I find conceptualization of products and services and the use of brands highly interesting and I plan to write separate posts exploring the subject in relation to business models.

Broadening the concept of revenue model
As with the term value proposition, the common perception of the term revenue model when used in relation to business models, is according to me rather narrow. I often talk about the "revenue and benefit model" and the main thing I want to understand is "What do I get in return for providing value to each value recipient?" The term revenue model implies revenues, money, but as the website Boardofinnovation shows in its building blocks, benefits can also be other things such as attention or exposure.

I would argue that what a business can get in return for providing value to a value recipient can be much more than attention and exposure, with examples such as cross-licensing of technology and IP to get access to new assets and capabilities, user data to improve services or improve the value for advertisers, adoption of a technology platform or service to create momentum and obtain network externalities, co-development efforts to lower cost and reduce risks etc.


To read more about the 10 building blocks and see some examples please visit Boardofinnovation

Further reading:
What is a business model?
What is a value proposition?
The Business Model Canvas

Sunday, April 5, 2009

The Profit Zone (1997)

The Profit Zone: How Strategic Business Design Will Lead You to Tomorrow's Profits by Adrian J. Slywotzky and David J. Morrison

This is a quick read and according to me a rather good book in the quick-read-business-genre. It is divided into three parts where the first part discusses business models and how profit happens. The second part is about successful business design reinventors such as Jack Welch (GE), Nicolas G Hayek (SMH) and Roberto Goizueta (Coca-Cola). In the third part the authors summarize its customer-centric and profit-centric thinking in what they call The Profit Zone Handbook. I will only present some of the ideas from the first part which I find most useful.

The Customer and Profitability in focus
The customer-centric view is dominant in the book and the main recommendation is to truly understand the customer behavior, decision-making process, price sensitivities and preferences, and design the business model accordingly. Businesses must be designed for profitability and as the arena in which high profit is possible keeps changing, so must the business model. The main questions repeated several times are:
  • Where will I be allowed to make a profit in this industry?
  • How should I design my business model so that it will be profitable?
The authors define the concept of business design (but also use the term business model) as composed of four elements or dimensions that are all linked to the others:

Customer selection
  • Which customers do I want to serve?
  • To which customers can I add real value?
  • Which customers will allow me to profit?
  • Which customers do I not want to serve?
Value Capture
  • How do I make a profit?
  • How do I capture, as profit, a portion of the value I created for customers?
  • What is my profit model?
Strategic Control
  • How do I protect my profit stream?
  • Why do my chosen customers buy from me?
  • What makes my value proposition unique/differentiated vs. Other competitors?
  • What strategic control points can counterbalance customer or competitor power?
Scope
  • What activities do I perform?
  • What products, services, and solutions do I want to sell?
  • Which activities or functions do I want to perform in-house?
  • Which ones do I want to subcontract, out-source, or work with a business partner to provide?

This is somewhat similar to my approach to business models; starting at who the value is created for, how the value is created and captured, and how the value creation and capture is controlled. The traditional way, presented in most literature about business models and in Exhibit 2.2 in the book, is to start from assets/core competencies and go through inputs/raw material, product/service offering, channels and finally the customer. The authors define their customer-centric model by starting on the customers' needs and priorities and then move in the other direction of the chain ultimately to the assets/core competencies needed to satisfy the customers' needs.

Strategic Control Point Index
As I find very little literature about business models looking at control mechanisms, I am happy to see what the authors call Strategic Control Point that is similar to my reasoning about Control Mechanisms. "Every good business design has at least one strategic control point. The best business designs have two or more."

In Exhibit 3.4 the authors present 10 different Strategic Control Points:
Own the standard, (High profit-protecting power)
Examples: Microsoft, Oracle
Manage the value chain, (High)
Examples: Intel, Coke
String of superdominant positions, (High)
Example: Coke internationally
Own the customer relationship, (High)
Examples: GE, EDS
Brand, copyright, (Medium)
Examples: countless
Two-year product development lead, (Medium)
Example: Intel
One-year product development lead, (Low)
Examples: few
Commodity with 10 to 20 percent cost advantage, (Low)
Examples: Nucor, SW air
Commodity with cost parity, (None)
Examples: countless
Commodity with cost disadvantage, (None)
Examples: countless

Identified profit models
How and why profitability occurs varies significantly from one industry or company to another. Slywotzky and Morrison have identified 22 profit models and shortly explain how profit is made in each of the models. These are:

1. Customer Solutions Profit
2. Product Pyramid Profit
3. Multicomponent Profit
4. Switchboard Profit
5. Time Profit
6. Block Buster profits
7. Multiplier Profit
8. Entrepreneur Profit
9. Specialization Profit
10. Install Base Profit
11. De Facto Standard Profit
12. Brand Profit
13. Specialty Product Profit
14. Local Leadership Profit
15. Transaction Scale Profit
16. Value Chain Position Profit
17. Cycle Profit
18. After-Sale Profit
19. New Product Profit
20. Relative Market Share Profit
21. Experience Curve Profit
22. Low Cost Business Design Profit

It is a quick read and if you read the book I look forward to your comments!