Showing posts with label Cathol-og-osphere. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cathol-og-osphere. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Late Night Linky Love

There have been quite a few smaller things that I wanted to post on, but I don't like just linking to a post and giving you my opinion. That to me is lazy blogging, at least when done with regularity. Therefore, I decided that if I want to make sure my readers see soemthing, I will do short little posts like this.

Have fun clicking away, Wikipedia style on all the links below!

Monday, April 26, 2010

The Ordinary become extraordinary

The Crescat has posted one of the most concise and important posts that I have read in a long time. She covers vocations, the importance of the Mass to our faith, and the necessity for our clergy  and the Church to interact with children in a real and personal way. She explains how this interaction cannot be watered down and aloof. It must be authentic and real; the interaction must convey the normalcy and happiness that accompanies the religious life. Never has this message been more important than now, in a time when we as a Church face so much adversity and pervasive evil.

I hope other blogs link to this. I just found it and imagine it will sweep the Catholog-os-phere like wildfire... and if it doesn't the bloggers are slacking in their duty:
... I blog what I know and observe. I am no expert on the mass in the extraordinary form. I can not provide deep theological pontifications from a scholarly perspective. I also can not give you details of who was in attendance, those Catholic celebrities... I am terrible with names. This isn't that type of blog, and jokes aside, I am really not that type of Catholic. I'm from a simpler sort, and this post is from an even simpler perspective... that of a child.

The blog coverage of the Pontifical Solemn High Mass has been vast, with commentary and extraordinary photos. I took a few myself with my cell phone but the quality was poor. I wish I snapped a few shots of the children though. I regret that.

More so than all the beauty that surrounded me at that mass, within the liturgy and the church itself, was the beauty and looks of absolute wonder on the children's faces. I guess because I am mom I notice these things.

I noticed two little boys in some matching traditional Asian dress who kept peeking around the pews. They would get up and cautiously walk up as close as they could to see what was going on. The babies in their parents arms would raise their sleepy heads and look around at the sound of the chorus, as if angels had called their names. Toddlers sat in stunned awe and craned their necks to look at the ceiling mosaics or stand on their tip toes to look over the seated heads.

It was a mass that enveloped their entire senses; sight, sound and smell. I know it will leave a lasting impression. I still remember the first time I went to a Catholic mass as an unchurched child and the mark it left on me unbeknownst at the time but resurfacing almost two decades later.

It was a mass that fosters vocations... as I believe any reverently celebrated mass has the opportunity to be. Any time a child witnesses something so out of ordinary [hence "extraordinary" form] it burns itself into their memory.

It is why I am so adamantly opposed to the removal of sacred art from churches, or congregational centered worship. If we can think of it in terms of our children, our future, then we owe it to our faith to keep our churches beautiful and our masses solemn. The look of wide eyed wonder on their faces said it all.

Afterward I took my son to the blognic... yes, The Boy was in bar. Parental fail, I know. Let me justify, I would never miss a chance to have The Boy interact with clergy and seminarians. I think it is important for him to see that they are men. Normal men. Men who like to be sociable and love to laugh over a few beers enjoying the camaraderie. Too often when people think of the vocation of the priesthood the first thought is of all the things you must give up. Worldly things. Like material possessions and sex. My son needs to see that being a priest doesn't mean giving up your love of life and your desire for joy and fun. He sees them as intelligent and charismatic. Role models. Good role models. Men who are genuinely happy.

I have one rule for my family... they must never bash The Church or say anything negative about a priest or other member of a religious community in front of my son. So far they have respected my wishes. Whether my son becomes a priest or religious is between him and Christ, but I will do my damndest in the meantime to not persuade his opinion in a negative direction.

I wish I had thought to thank the seminarians and priests who talked with my son. They treated him with respect, talked to him not as a child but really conversed with him. And even now, he was still talking about the chicken fingers Fr. Z bought him and the Roy Rogers he got to drink at the bar with the young man in a cassock who was wearing glasses... I wish I could remember his name. He told The Boy he knew he wanted to be a priest when he was only nine years old.

I can't imagine the grace involved in that. I am almost 35 and still haven't decided what I want to be when I grow up.

I apologize, I ramble. I just felt like it needed to be said. I love our priests, I support our seminarians. Thank you gentlemen.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

'Flip the tables over' or 'turn the other cheek?'

One of my favorite "spiritual treat" blogs: Adoro Te Devote has an interesting post, that really got me thinking. The basic premise of the post, at least what I took from it, is that 'we should all be charitable when we blog' and that we cannot 'make a living' off of tearing others down and further our goals and ideas at the expense of others.

She explains that our blogs cannot exist for the purpose of making ourselves seem as if we are "good Catholics." For example she argues:
We CANNOT, as bloggers, base our blogs on tearing down others in order to make ourselves look good in the eyes of other sinners like us who will be fueled to add their own gripes, their own judgments, and their own form of superiority at the expense of sinners who apparently aren't like us.
I think she is on to something here. She is essentially arguing that if we make ourselves look good at the expense of others, we really aren't making any positive strides. She does recognize a need at times to bring truth forward and shine light on evil, but seems to think that this should be the exception and not the rule. She it explains it as such:
I can't speak for other bloggers, nor do I judge their souls, but I do judge their actions and this, in particular. Do we need to shine a light on what is wrong at times? Certainly! The Church Fathers were not adverse to such things! The modern question is this, though: Is it really necessary to focus our lives on ripping on thy neighbor in order to proclaim the Truth?
Now for much of her post I agree with her. I know that there are some blogs, sometimes unintentionally that solely focus on 'tearing others down.' This is how they exist. But is it really necessary? Many would argue that this DOES go beyond the limits of what is charitable and just.

Where is the line though? What is the demarcation? Is charity the same regardless of the issue? Must we always refrain from pointing out scandal, heresy and illicit teachings? At what point do we choose to 'flip over the tables' instead of 'turning the other cheek?' This is a very difficult question I think.

Sure, we could take advantage of every little scandal and blog about it. The thing is, 50 other blogs will be doing the same thing... so what are we REALLY accomplishing at the end of the day. I think this is a key point, that might go unstated in Adoro Te Devote's Post. She explains that personal gain through complaining or 'tearing down' really isn't a gain for God. So how then do we accomplish gain for God and at the same time deny and destroy the falsity that is perpetrated by many in the name of Catholicism? Must we do one without the other?

I ask you the reader... how do we make this difficult decision? I wonder if the answer lies in the intent of the post. I don't offer consequentialism as an answer to anything. I mean intent in terms of the virtue and ethic of the core meaning in the post. Is that where our line of demarcation sits? What say you, readers and writers of the Cathologosphere?

Monday, April 12, 2010

Blog Awards? Yes, blog awards, but not just ANY blog awards...


The 4th Annual Cannonball Catholic Blog AWARDS!

Kat, over at The Crescat is hosting her annual Catholic Blog Awards. The award categories are a lot of fun, and best of all you learn about a lot of new Catholic Blogs. The process works by nominating blogs in the comments and then in a few days she will allow people to vote by category.

Honestly... the whole thing makes me realize how much more I wish I could do with this blog, and how some people really are just gifted at this sort of thing. But then again I do know how to... um... umm.... why don't we look at the categories :)
The list of the categories is:
  • Best Blog by a Religious... not Fr. Z
  • Best Political Blog... not the American Papist
  • More Catholic Than the Pope
  • Best Blog by a Heretic
  • Best Armchair Theologian
  • Best Under Appreciated Blog
  • Best Visual Treat
  • Best Spiritual Treat
  • Most Bat Shit Crazy
  • Most Church Militant
  • Best Potpourri of Popery
  • Snarkiest Catholic Blog
  • Best Hifreakinlarious Blog
  • Best New Kid on the Block
  • Best Blog That Needs to be Updated More Often
So go check it out, and nominate your favorite blogs today!

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Excellent Pro-Life Video from Fallible Blogma - MUST SEE!

Matthew Warner over at Fallible Blogma has made a MUST SEE pro-life video...
It has been making the Catholic Blog rounds... but I had to link and re-post because it is a must see!

Please use the "Add This" button at the bottom to share this post... people need to see this simple message, especially the Pro-"Choice'rs":



Friday, March 5, 2010

Community

Over the past few days this little blog has seen quite a few visitors. From the outside it is hard to really see that outside a few of the Comment boxes blowing up, but from the visit tracker it was a wild ride.

As the Notre Dame story settles down, and as the links from the big blogs and some of the smaller ones go further down their page, this blog will settle back into its faithful following again but hopefully with some new readers.

That being said, I need to add some blogs to the side-bar. Some have directed attention here in the past few days, while others are ones that I read but that I have been lazy in getting them posted. So without further delay here they are:

Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate
(This blog is great, I find myself blogging, or not blogging a lot of what is posted over there. On top of that the title of the blog was one that I wanted originally, only to find that it was taken, and well represented)

Gun Lovin' Alaskan Catholic Club
(Seriously... the name says it all. After my own heart with a name like that. This guy can blog... if he has the time. Hopefully this new blog will get rollin.)

Roman Catholic Cop
(I think the name says it all.... just found this blog, and excited that I have)

Aggie Catholics
(This is another blog that I have read for a long time, and for whatever reason have gotten around to linking... that problem is now solved.)

That is all for now. There are more... but I don't want to overload readers with too many. I know that a lot of our readers don't blog a ton, so some of these "oldies" are worth mentioning. So check them out, drop them a comment, and let them know I sent ya!

-Posted by: Joe

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Whispers of a Surprise...

So the Cathol-og-osphere is ALL a-buzz with Vatican Rumors!!

There are two major ones, swirling about. One involves an "announcement" or "surprise" that the Holy Father will be announcing during Holy Week. [The original source for this is: Sector Catolico (A Spanish Blog)] There is a lot of speculation about what it might be [My comments in red]:

  • A Holy Week Mass either Ad Orientem or in the usus antiquior [This would make a very strong statement regarding the "reform of the reform."]
  • The removal of the indult for Communion "in the hand" [This too would make a very important statement regarding the liturgy, Mass, and what the "reform of the reform" really means.]
  • The return of the Sedia Gestatoria, some Papal vesture, or other traditional "item. [Although these are great in their own right, this would be somewhat of a let-down in comparison to the other "possibilities."]
  • The announcement of some advancement in the causes of Pope Pius XII or Pope John Paul II. [There are those that weigh in heavily on these possibilities - I wonder if a Saintly causes would be addressed during Holy Week?]


Now these aren't the only possibilities but they seem the most "favored." Now to show you that this isn't just random "Catholic" gossip you can read this same story at the MAJOR blogs below:




The other rumor needs it's own post...later.


-Posted by: Joe

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Honoring the Dead...

On wednesday, a trainer at Sea World tragically was killed performing her job, which is the the care and training of Orca's [aka Killer Whales].

You can read about the incident in the Orlando Sentinel:
SeaWorld Trainer is Killed in Killer Whale Attack


My take on this has nothing to do with the actual incident, but instead the way that many Catholic bloggers have treated this. A lot of bloggers have decided to take the time to blog, tweet, or post about this. Which is fine, but in doing so they have done it in a flippant and somewhat disrespectful way. They point out that they "are called Killer Whales for a reason."

I understand their point, I think we all do. Yet isn't there still some bit of honor we owe this woman? Yes I know her job may be 'foolish' to some, but she viewed it as her dream job. Also, how many of us have EVER been to an aquarium, zoo, or SeaWorld? If we have, then we don't REALLY think these people are foolish AND pointless do we? In fact, we are glad they exist.

So why are we as Catholics not honoring this woman? It would be one thing if a blogger chose NOT to post about this incident. That is fine, a Catholic blogger does not have an obligation to POST about every death that occurs and makes the front page of the news. Yet, when a Catholic blogger CHOOSES to post about something, they have then taken on the responsibility to practice the virtues of the FAITH in their post.

It is always hard to criticize other Catholics. I think one should only criticize ACTIONS and not the person themself. So, I am not trying to be "Holier than thou..." I am only trying to say that, it is important that as Catholic bloggers we are careful when we choose to blog about things. Although the internet allows a degree of distance to remain between "information and people" it does not mean that the issues and incidents which we post about don't have implications beyond the words on the screen. Most things that posts talk about are about real people and real events. We need to honor those people, and in situations like this honor the dead.

May Dawn Brancheau Requiescat in pace.

-Posted by: Joe


Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Catholic Blog... Celebrities?

So there has been some murmuring of late on the blogs that I read about "Catholic Blog Celebrities." Now the word CELBRITY is not used per se but that is meaning behind the message. While I was on hiatus, I didn't check my RSS reader, so I had quite a bit of CATCHING UP TO DO and this was one of the "themes" that caught my eye.

The argument was that these personalities are so big that they have become something contrary to their purpose. One of the arguments raised was that someone like Father Z. shouldn't be asking for or listing his Amazon Wish List online; or that the list in and of itself is excessive, in that it lists big ticket items. I am not sure if the person was more upset that he was listing such items or actually getting them. [I have made a post about Amazon before... WISH LISTS] Obviously this "problem" is purely the law of numbers. More people read Father Z's website than Blogger X's. Therefore there is a greater chance that someone will donate to Father Z. than Blogger X. Also, Blogger X's contribution while GREAT and IMPORTANT, doesn't always attract those that are WILLING to donate or gift. On top of that, the COLLAR helps, period.

Now some have poked fun at the idea of Father Z. asking for money for Bird Seed. Now, I won't get into that argument, because I don't think it is fruitful on this blog, and I also think that it is a pretty cut and dry issue and people can make up their own mind. But what about someone like Mark Shea? He supports himself via blogging, book writing, and speaking? Should he not get such things via Blog "Tips"? I mean, let's say you work at Store X, and you sell widgets. You get paid hourly, and then go out and buy an iPod or a Porsche. Isn't that your choice? Should I the consumer tell you or get to dictate how you spend your money? Of course not.

Now, do I think there is some inequity in "Tipping"? Maybe... but again it comes down to NUMBERS. There are many Catholic bloggers that have "stories." As I talked about in my previous post I thought long and hard about putting a Pay Pal or Amazon link on the blog for "Tipping." At first I had Pay Pal but took it off. I did leave the Amazon list up, but list only items RELEVANT to the blog or my personal life that would then relate back to the blog. Not because I think that other items shouldn't be on a list like that, I just choose to operate in a certain fashion.


What do you all think? Should Catholic Bloggers, especially the celebrity types have such Wish Lists? Are there correct and incorrect things to have on such lists? Is a person WRONG in some ethical way for buying such things for a person which lists them?

Personally... someone can get me this:


Whomever gets this for me, will receive a share of the meat I take with it for the duration of my use of this weapon :)

-Posted by: Joe

Friday, February 12, 2010

As the Catholic Blog-o-world Spins: Link Round-Up


••• New Missal Translation Petitions:
 Mr. Peters over at American Papist has a good post regarding the two petitions concerning the new translation of the Roman Missal.

  • Supporting the New Translation - Approx: 4000
  • Against the New Translation - Approx: 14,000
As Peters says:
Not to put my hand on the scales here, but I’d hate to think that if an outside observer looked at both petitions, they would conclude that more Catholics want to see us continue using the old, flawed translations conconted in the 70’s, as opposed to joyfully embracing the new, vibrant, faithful translation (which of course, actually brings us closer to the perennial liturgical tradition of the universal Church).
 ••• The Crescast is off to see the Pope... with some help:


One of the bloggers that I find very funny: The Crescat is finally going to take her dream trip to Malta!
She needs a little help though. She plans on going for the Papal Visit, so things will book up quick and she needs some financial support. I can't do that, but I can at least get the word out. She is a good girl, is raising a son and putting herself through nursing school. Every little bit helps!



••• Lent Resources: Aggie Catholics:


Every Catholic blogger and their mom is posting the Aggie Catholics blog post regarding Lent Resources. After reading it, I realized that it was worth posting as well. Plus I didn't want to go against the Blogo-Karma... oh wait... Catholic Karma?

•••Nuns or Sisters? - The Dominican NUNS explain...:



In light of the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist being on Oprah, the Dominican Nuns explained how the NUNS weren't on tv, but the Dominican Sisters were. It is a quick primer on what exactly Dominican Nuns are versus Dominican Sisters. They explain that Dominican Nuns are a specific order... and that not all Dominican Sisters are NUNS. 

•••AmP: The Kickbee: Baby tweeting from the womb:


You should probably just read American Papist instead of my blog. But since you are here... AmP posted a cute post about a new product: Kickbee. The most poigniant part of the post is where the AmP posited the question: "So unborn babies can have twitter accounts but not legal rights?" Touche. 

•••Cardinal Mahony Stamps his approval on the New Missal Translation:

I read on Sancte Pater that Cardinal Mahony has endorsed the New Missal Translation on his Blog. This is a powerful endorsement, and we American Catholics should not take it lightly. Go check out the post and check out Cardinal Mahony's Blog as well!


-Posted by: Joe



Monday, January 11, 2010

The Spirit of Liturgical Reform - An Intro

If you are wasting your time and reading my blog and have not "The Spirit of the Liturgy" by then Cardinal Ratzinger, stop what you are doing, purchase it, and read it. It is amazingly well written and explains the purpose of the liturgy in a way we can all understand and NEED to understand. Seriously, go now. [Click on the pic below]


Recently the Clergy Conference in Rome had a presentation about this topic. Specifically the talk was about the importance of the Spirit of the Liturgy and the reform of our current liturgical practices to recapture this "Spirit." This talk is posted at: The New Liturgical Movement. The website, which I have linked before and is on the sidebar, was also linked by Father Z. who did an EXCELLENT inline commentary on the presentation. You can find it here, and will teach you a whole lot more than I ever could. The post I am linking is Father Z's commentary on the "Benedictine Arrangment" which is an explanation of a liturgical way of celebrating the mass in lieu of ad orientem but still accomplishes the same goal. Read his post here: Fr. Z's Commentary on Msgr. Marini's Liturgical Form. Father Z has also done an AWESOME post on active participation which is written in the same vain. Read that here: Fr. Z's Commentary on Active Participation - From Msgr. Marini

So instead of trying to improve or comment on things that are already written I would like to comment on the more basic elements of the talk. The talk was given by Msgr. Guido Marini who is the Pontifical Minister of Liturgical Ceremonies. [Does that make him PMLC Marini?] This first portion is his introduction to the talks that Fr. Z has commented on. The talk stems from the book mentioned above. I will do a commentary below on his intro. I will do a separate post about one of his more substantive areas. I hope this encourages to think about the Liturgy differently, and hopefully it will also encourage you to read, "The Spirit of the Liturgy."

Here is Msgr. Marini's introduction from his talk taken from the New Liturgical Movement [My comments are in red, my emphases in the original are bolded]:


I propose to focus on some topics connected to the spirit of the liturgy and reflect on them with you; indeed, I intend to broach a subject which would require me to say much. Not only because it is a demanding and complex task to talk about the spirit of the liturgy, but also because many important works treating this subject have already been written by authors of unquestionably high caliber in theology and the liturgy. I’m thinking of two people in particular among the many: Romano Guardini and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger.
One the other hand, it is now all the more necessary to speak about the spirit of the liturgy, especially for us members of the sacred priesthood. Moreover, there is an urgent need to reaffirm the “authentic” spirit of the liturgy, [He is asserting the notion that there is a specific "authentic" spirit to the liturgy which exists and one assumes is universal.] such as it is present in the uninterrupted tradition of the Church, and attested, in continuity with the past, in the most recent Magisterial teachings: starting from the second Vatican council up to the present pontificate. I purposefully used the word continuity, a word very dear to our present Holy Father. He has made it the only authoritative criterion whereby one can correctly interpret the life of the Church, and more specifically, the conciliar documents, including all the proposed reforms contained in them. How could it be any different? Can one truly speak of a Church of the past and a Church of the future as if some historical break in the body of the Church had occurred? [This is vitally important - he does not say that Vatican II is incorrect, nor does he say the past is better, instead he speaks of CONTINUITY.] Could anyone say that the Bride of Christ had lived without the assistance of the Holy Spirit in a particular period of the past, so that its memory should be erased, purposefully forgotten?
Nevertheless at times it seems that some individuals are truly partisan to a way of thinking that is justly and properly defined as an ideology, or rather a preconceived notion applied to the history of the Church which has nothing to do with the true faith. [I do not dare accuse any of this, but it is possible that many of our extreme bloggers on both ends of the spectrum might want to take this idea to heart. Faith and not ideology is key.]
An example of the fruit produced by that misleading ideology is the recurrent distinction between the preconciliar and the post conciliar Church. Such a manner of speaking can be legitimate, but only on condition that two Churches are not understood by it: one, the pre Conciliar Church, that has nothing more to say or to give because it has been surpassed, and a second, the post conciliar church, a new reality born from the Council and, by its presumed spirit, not in continuity with its past. This manner of speaking and more so of thinking must not be our own. [IMPORTANT!!] Apart from being incorrect, it is already superseded and outdated, perhaps understandable from a historical point of view, but nonetheless connected to a season in the church’s life by now concluded. [This cannot be overstated. I should have bolded the whole paragraph and in fact this paragraph is my catalyst for this entire post. It speaks to my recent post and explains that we must not suppose an "either or" solution to our liturgical reform.]
Does what we have discussed so far with respect to “continuity” have anything to do with the topic we have been asked to treat in this lecture? Yes, absolutely. The authentic spirit of the liturgy does not abide when it is not approached with serenity, leaving aside all polemics with respect to the recent or remote past. The liturgy cannot and must not be an opportunity for conflict between those who find good only in that which came before us, and those who, on the contrary, almost always find wrong in what came before. The only disposition which permits us to attain the authentic spirit of the liturgy, with joy and true spiritual relish, is to regard both the present and the past liturgy of the Church as one patrimony in continuous development. [This man understands words. He uses continuous and development at the end of this thought. I think it is safe to assume that the liturgy while universal is not static throughout history.] A spirit, accordingly, which we must receive from the Church and is not a fruit of our own making. A spirit, I add, which leads to what is essential in the liturgy, or, more precisely, to prayer inspired and guided by the Holy Spirit, in whom Christ continues to become present for us today, to burst forth into our lives. Truly, the spirit of the liturgy is the liturgy of the Holy Spirit.
I will not pretend to plumb the depths of the proposed subject matter, nor to treat all the different aspects necessary for a panoramic and comprehensive understanding of the question. I will limit myself by discussing only a few elements essential to the liturgy, specifically with reference to the celebration of the Eucharist, such as the Church proposes them, and in the manner I have learned to deepen my knowledge of them these past two years in service to our Holy Father, Benedict XVI. He is an authentic master of the spirit of the liturgy, whether by his teaching, or by the example he gives in the celebration of the sacred rites.
If, during the course of these reflections on the essence of the liturgy, I will find myself taking note of some behaviours that I do not consider in complete harmony with the authentic spirit of the liturgy, I will do so only as a small contribution to making this spirit stand out all the more in all its beauty and truth. [This introduction lays the groundwork for what is to come. I don't believe that Msgr. Marini suggests in any way that the past or present liturgical forms cannot posses this true spirit. Instead he is only denying the idea that only one or the other may do so.]
This introduction to his talk is crucial to understanding his comments on Pope Benedict XVI's work "The Spirit of the Liturgy." Msgr. Marini is well aware of the current state of Liturgical practice, the reforms of Vatican II, and the current "reform of the reform" occurring through the efforts of Rome and specifically the Holy Father.  I don't think anyone is more capable and appropriate to speak on this subject than the man responsible for coordinating the Liturgical celebrations of the Pope. I think many of us in the Cathologosphere would do well to heed his words regarding the idea that we must strive for CONTINUITY both with the past, present and future.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Reforming the "Reform of the Reform"?

The Catholic Blogosphere, or as I call it the Cathologosphere, seems to be reaching one of those points that makes all sides dig trenches and hunker down. As the "reform of the reform" gains traction around the country, and the world, the divide between traditionalists and modernists seems to be widening.

Now, we are on the "interwebs" so it is hard to say how much of this is the product of a bunch of malcontent folks spewing their opinion for the world to read, and how much of it is actually symbolic of the actual climate of the Catholic world.

There is no doubt that the modernist mayhem of modernist progressive Catholics is spreading like some toxic gas in some places within the Church. One cannot deny that these folks are products of the '60s and were emboldened by the changes instituted by Vatican II. In fact, it is probably fair to say that most were actually BORN from Vatican II's changes. But they are no more the "Children of Vatican II" or "Products of" Vatican II, than abusive priests are the product of an archaic chaste lifestyle. In other words, the proximate cause of these progressives are not necessarily causally linked to the heart of Vatican II, instead they are relativistic minds run amok. 

Likewise, the radical traditionalists that feel the ONLY way we can reclaim the "glory" of the Church is to put everything back in Latin and undo Vatican II completely and go back to the year... umm... what year do we go back to. 1964? 1970? 1962? 1953? [Those aren't random years by the way.] The all or nothing traditionalists [trying to avoid to descriptive or peg-holed type of labels] would probably start fighting amongst themselves if they didn't have the progressives to target. In fact, that is essentially what they did prior to 2007, isn't it?


Now, I am pointing with pretty broad brushes here, and again I do not mean the majority here. In fact, if you took 50 blogs and laid them out on the spectrum, we are talking the extreme edges and maybe 1 or 2 on each end, with a few more straddling the line here or there on a few issues or with a few posts. But it is enough to feel their presence lately. This is especially true as those same folks spew their ideas into Com-boxes on the rest of the Cathologosphere.

So what should the rest of us do? I say we fight back, like I always suggest. As the Mission Verse of this blog states, "the kingdom of Heaven suffers much violence... and the violent are taking it by force!" We must not succumb to these low blows but must in fact battle against them. The Church, our Church, the BODY OF CHRIST requires of us that we focus our hearts and our Faith towards HIM. The faith must not be the desire of our hearts, but HIS Heart. 

Of course we can have our preferences. I know I do, and I know my preference often finds itself in a "traditional form" but that doesn't mean the rest of the Catholic world is wrong. In fact, if we believe that God guides the faith, then we must believe that this is true and find in those things which are said to be "incorrect," the true and actual God-ly meaning behind them. For instance, Vatican II - its documents need to be read and interpreted with this in mind. So too much the past be viewed in light of the fact that the Church has since its inception undergone changes through time, never has it been static and yet has always striven to be universal. 

It is our job as Catholic to unite under-God. This does not mean that we compromise by any means necessary to do so, it means instead that we must look inside of our motives and desires and determine if those things which we hope to place upon our Faith are themselves directed at the Truth, the one true, living, and ever lasting God. Only then can the Kingdom of Heaven truly reign supreme united in Heaven and on Earth with the Body of Christ as its army and fold. I don't think that we must reform the "reform of the reform" - but we must reform those that are unwilling to be God centered and are instead self-centered. 

For more on this topic read these:

Thursday, January 7, 2010

A question for readers regarding "Blog Tipping"...



((**UPDATE**)):
This post was written in response to an inquiry someone had regarding Blog "tipping." I DID NOT INTEND FOR IT TO BE AN APPEAL. I really just wanted to know why people "tipped" bloggers and it was written out of sincere curiosity.


So I have a question for readers. "Why do you give/tip the bloggers that you do?" This isn't meant as a complaint or whine about those who give graciously to bloggers, it is an honest question.

You see, I know that bloggers like: Fr. Z, Mark Shea, and others get a lot of what they "earn" from their blogs. I know specifically those two gentlemen deserve such gracious and charitable gifts, but I wonder what encourages you to give?

I know for example, that when I started my blog, someone suggested that I put a paypal tip button as well as an Amazon Wishlist button on my sidebar "just in case." I felt really odd about it, because it seemed awkward. The argument for such a thing was that if someone really enjoyed the blog, it would be the equivalent of them buying me a cup of coffee, a drink, or a meal. I know that I publish this blog for my own enjoyment, and the enjoyment of anyone who takes a liking to it. Sure there is a little bit of "ego" which spills into it, but the same as any "labor of love."

I was just curious if folks out there had a METHOD to the madness. I don't usually make any appeals for my tip jar or wishlist, because I don't depend on those for any type of subsistence. [I guess I could start especially with a baby coming- I might actually get some new books :) ... ooo I wonder if I can figure out a way for readers to donate FIREARMS to me; hmm... maybe some posts on such a thing!] I just wondered if it was the APPEAL? The purpose to which the funds/gifts would be used? The quality of the blog? ETC?

I know that when I give to a charity I really look into who I am giving my money to, and how it will be spent. I guess in that regard giving to a religious blogger seems to be a safe endeavour. How about "gifting" things? Is it the item you like or the persons "need" for it?


I don't think I will start any "appeals" only because I would rather have others receive the kindness of the blogosphere readers out there because I am pretty content with my station in life. [Yet, for those wealthy readers who need a tax shelter you can always give to the Joe Likes to Read Catholic Books and Shoot Guns Foundation of Goodness Charity :)] I just wanted to know what "encourages" or "gets" people to give. I think it is a neat thing that there are those bloggers out there that receive such charity and kindness from people, on a regular basis and in substantial enough amounts to make life a little easier.

So let me know your rationale! And for those that give GOD BLESS!!!

American Papist - NEW AND IMPROVED

Not that he needs any help in the promotion department but Thomas Peters has update and partnered with CatholicVoteAction.org.

You can check out some of the new features at:
http://catholicvoteaction.org/blog/amp/index.php?p=262


Thomas is a great blogger, and has inspired plenty of us bloggers out here in the Cathologosphere in different ways as we have all attempted to grow and improve our own blogs. The folks over at Catholic Vote and Catholic Vote Action are great people as well and I know this partnership is going to mean GREAT things in the future.

So go check out the new home for AmP, and if you haven't visited before check it out and you will see why AmP wins awards every year as one of the top Catholic blogs on the web!

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

"Rad Trads" - an explanation.

So uber-blogger Mark Shea blogged a grea post [which word becomes the verb here?] today about Radical Tradionalists, or "Rad Trads": Mark Shea - "Rad Trads"

As a TRADDY or Traditionalist, I like to think of myself acting properly in terms of how I practice my faith, and relate it on this blog. I also know that for SOME I am not Traditionalist "enough" to really be considered a Traditionalsit; while others think of me being "too rigid" and Traditionalist and therefore closer to a "Rad Trad" than I actually am.

I don't always agree with Mr. Shea, but I feel that I agree with most of his post. The clincher for me is how he explains any "RADICAL" form of  "sub-culture" or "piety":  that once a sub-culture or piety reduces the ENTIRE CATHOLIC faith to itself and its own rules, there is a problem. I would agree.

So while I may prefer certain things, and even bemoan others, I do not think any one "movement" is wholly incorrect. Likewise, I think the Catholic Faith would be better served if more people acted with this this same set of principles. I know that for the most part this is more a creature of the Cathologosphere, but even as such it still does damage to the Faith at large because it pits brother against brother.

As a parting note, I do not want to suggest that we should not be free to be critical of those things which are contrary to the Catholic Faith or its teachings. Yet, we should not throw the baby out with the bathwater. In other words we need to do our diligence in determining those things which we need to criticize and those that we need to praise - as well as those things we need to discard and keep.